ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>Using two antithrombotic treatment (clopidogrel vs. clopidogrel combined warfarin) strategies after femoral-popliteal artery angioplasty prospectively, to evaluate which strategy is more effective for the restenosis prevention.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Totally 50 patients referred for endovascular treatment (including the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stent implantation) of the superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery from January 2008 to May 2009 were randomly divided into clopidogrel group (group A, 25 cases, 30 limbs) and clopidogrel plus warfarin group (group B, 25 cases, 33 limbs) before operation. Clinical outcomes and restenosis rate of the target lesions were evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Totally 88 patients were screened for participation in the study, 56 patients were included after the follow-up of 12 months. At 3 months, the rates of restenosis were 16.7% in group A and 18.2% in group B (χ² = 0.025, P = 0.874). At 6 months, the accumulated restenosis rates were 36.7% in group A and 36.4% in group B (χ² = 0.001, P = 0.98). At 12 months, the accumulated restenosis rates were 53.3% in group A and 42.4% in group B (χ² = 0.75, P = 0.387). Analysis for the critical limb ischemia sub-group showed that follow-up of 12 months, the accumulated restenosis rate was 8/10 in group A and 6/12 in group B (χ² = 1.023, P = 0.312).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The clopidogrel alone treatment for PTA or PTA plus stent implantation of femoral popliteal artery has no statistically significant difference in comparison with the clopidogrel combined warfarin treatment in terms of the cumulative vascular restenosis rate at 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively.</p>